I (s) dyad / The binary dell'asiento
For Papers "Collective R / Atahualpa" (Florence, 2010), comes the new poetry of Anthony Contilia I (s) dyad / The binary dell'Asiento . The introduction was done by Sergio Pattavina (University of Palermo).
introduction by Sergio Pattavina:
[...]
[...] Among the subjectivity of the poet with his abstract principles of liberty, equality, solidarity, peace, establishing a acrimonious disagreement with empirical reality made of exploitation, imperialist wars, old and new fascism, racism, giving rise to invective, irony, the most tricks in-sensible "for disarticulating the speech, the twisting alchemically language of text (literary, journalistic, television) has the power, the prerogative of the ruling classes. Not
We can not be observed, en passant, some chromosomal affinity with the "saturated" Latin, between Martial and Juvenal, that is, with that kind of transition that developed in imperial Rome, in the process of dissolution of classical art and the slave society, the whose essence is, according to Hegel, that "a virtuous soul that remains negated the realization of his conscience in a world of vice and folly, turned with passionate indignation or subtle wit and icy bitterness against a finding that is before , ridiculing or angry with the world that directly contradicts his ideas of virtue and truth "(Aesthetics). The outcome of this
attitude, the rhetorical and thematic landing, the flight can not be certain, neither existential nor language, from the present ("a premise without promise, insomnia / clotted where the desire to surf the anchor / poetry by the wonder gaze / look for a link to the embrace, and time / the time the predator is 'again', "in Exodus), as subjectivity is linked to being, but the poiesis bends and deep thinking in research of images that can bring up the critical distance, ideological and experiential-from being there, and hence some of the issues mentioned in the titles and verses from Contilia: exile, the exodus, the journey, the sinking, the sea, the rocks, the shore, and the transition boundary between us and the other from us, and finally, taking the interpretation of I (s) that I mentioned at the dyad 'beginning, eros, affirmation of our identity through the other, the boundary line and unity with the missing part of us, that power can not keep completely under control.